Avi Loeb and the Great Unknown


It was an otherwise non-notable day in October 2017 when Canadian astronomer Robert Weryk made an astonishing discovery.

Thanks to data from the University of Hawaii’s Pan-STARRS1 telescope at the Kaleakala Observatory in Hawaii, Weryk spotted an unusual object, oblong and approximately the size of a football field, screaming through the solar system at 196,000 miles per hour. Strangest of all was that it seemed to be accelerating slightly, pushed by an invisible force that has yet to be fully explained.

Its highly unusual trajectory caused it to slingshot past our Sun, leading scientists to believe that the space object — later dubbed “‘Oumuamua,” or “scout” in Hawaiian — was the first ever visitor from outside our solar system to be observed directly.

Over the last three years, countless attempts have been made to explain ‘Oumuamua’s unprecedented characteristics. Some speculated that it was hydrogen iceberg, while others suggested it was a traveling space rock covered in a layer of “organic sunscreen.”

To Avi Loeb, astrophysicist and professor of science at Harvard University, the answer could be a tantalizing one. His controversial argument is that ‘Oumuamua may have been a probe sent by an extraterrestrial civilization — an explanation that’s garnered enormous attention in the media and, unsurprisingly, proved divisive among experts.

In his new book, titled “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth,” Loeb explores his provocative hypothesis, using the story of ‘Oumuamua to lay the groundwork of a much greater conversation: the struggle to be taken seriously within a scientific community that has historically held the discussion surrounding the search for the existence of terrestrial intelligence at arm’s length.

During an interview with Futurism, Loeb argued that scientists’ explanations fell short of explaining ‘Oumuamua’s many quirks and eccentricities. The scientific community “advocated for something that we have never seen before,” he said.

One example of this was what Loeb referred to as the “dust bunny” hypothesis, which theorized that ‘Oumuamua’s odd trajectory could be explained by a very low density.

“The problem with that is I don’t think something of the size of a football field that is a dust bunny would survive a journey of millions of years through interstellar space,” Loeb said, vacuuming up that hypothesis. “I mean, I just don’t think that it can hold itself together.”

To Loeb, scientific explanations that attempted to squeeze ‘Oumuamua into an existing scientific framework just didn’t make sense.

“The point is, you can’t on the one hand say it’s natural,” Loeb argued, “and then whenever you try to actually explain it with natural processes, you come up with something that we have never seen before.”

And that’s how he ended up at aliens.


At the root of Loeb’s alien theory is that ‘Oumuamua may have been a solar sail sent to us from another star system.

In the simplest terms, a solar or light sail is a form of spacecraft propulsion that turns the low pressure of solar radiation into movement.  Earthling scientists have already experimented with the concept; in 2019, the non-profit Planetary Society launched a craft called LightSail-2, which uses 340 square feet of an extremely thin layer of reflective polyester film to gradually propel itself.

To Loeb, a solar sail being pushed by starlight could explain ‘Oumuamua’s unexpected acceleration. If it’s solid and isn’t a dust bunny, the astrophysicist concluded that the interstellar visitor must also be shockingly thin — perhaps, according to his calculations, “less than a millimeter thick.”

To the astronomer, the solar sail conclusion was following “footsteps, just like detective Sherlock Holmes. When you rule out all other possibilities, whatever you’re left with must be the truth.”

That conclusion is a stretch to many astronomers in the field, who have repeatedly challenged Loeb’s conclusion.

In a 2019 study published in the journal Nature Astronomy, an international team of researchers argued that they found “no compelling evidence to favor an alien explanation” for ‘Oumuamua.

“‘Oumuamua’s properties are consistent with a natural origin,” University of Maryland astronomer Matthew Knight, co-author of the study, told Reuters at the time, “and an alien explanation is unwarranted.”

Their argument was that ‘Oumuamua is a “planetesimal,” or a small fragment of a planetary building block that just happened to drift through our star system.

Weryk, who discovered the object in the first place, had no kind words for Loeb’s hypothesis. “Honestly, that’s a bit of wild speculation,” he told the CBC in 2018.

“I think it’s a remnant from another solar system,” Weryk added. “It’s just something that happened to run into us, and we were very lucky to have been operating the telescope that night and looking in that direction.”


These rebuttals appear to have only emboldened Loeb’s investigations into the alien origins of ‘Oumuamua — as well as leading him to make a passionate plea to the scientific community, as outlined in his book, to take SETI research seriously.

To Loeb, it’s all about reading the stars with an open mind.

“My guiding principle is modesty,” he told Futurism. “If we are not arrogant, if we are modest, we would say that life, the way we have it, must be common.”

“We now know from the Kepler satellite data that about half of the Sun-like stars have a planet like the Earth, roughly at the same distance, so that it can have liquid water and the chemistry of life as we know it,” Loeb said, referring to the “habitable zone” of a star system within which life can theoretically could be supported.

“So we know that the dice was rolled billions of times in the galaxy,” he said. “And if you arrange for similar circumstances like we have on Earth, you would get a similar outcome.”

To Loeb, this simple calculation is “conservative, not speculative,” and that it “should be the mainstream view.” But proposing that we are not alone in the universe is seen as a “fringe view and the mainstream claims there should be a taboo.”

“The scientific community can address a topic even if other people address it in a way that is not scientific and doesn’t make much sense,” Loeb argued.

“So my point is the existence of the literature on science fiction or the existence of unsubstantiated UFO reports should not eliminate this subject from being part of the mainstream discussion,” he added.

In fact, Loeb contended that it is less speculative than other areas of study, from the study of dark matter to multiverse and string theories.

“All of these hypothetical concept for which we have no basis,” he said. “And you have communities of hundreds of scientists working on giving each other awards and honors and so forth,” he added in a slightly derisive tone.

To him, the refusal to believe we are not alone in the universe is a vicious cycle of self-fulfilling prophecies.

“When you put blinders on, you’re not searching for anyone else, you might think that you’re special,” he said.

“The only way to break that taboo, to break that state of mind, is to find evidence for others,” Loeb argued. “But, if you don’t search, you will never find it,” closing the cycle.

Worst of all, a lack of funding for SETI research only ends up deterring “young people from entering this field,” Loeb said.


So the search for life beyond the Earth must go on — and Loeb has plenty of ideas on how to do so.

Arguably the most ambitious plan he’s involved with, a project called Breakthrough Starshot, is a proof-of-concept interstellar probe project by Breakthrough Initiatives that involves sending an army of small light sails called Starchips as far as Alpha Centauri, the closest star system to our own at just over four light years away.

The Centauri system contains a promising planetary candidate called Proxima b, a tantalizingly Earth-like planet.

Four light year may not sound like much on paper, but the distances that the sails would have to cover are immense. Rather than harnessing the solar radiation from the Sun, the project is investigating if we can shoot an extremely powerful laser at these spacecraft from here on Earth to provide enough acceleration.

It’s an endeavor that involves near-insurmountable hurdles. In fact, Loeb isn’t sure if the Starshot project will materialize in his lifetime — and Breakthrough Initiatives estimates that it could take 20 years for the mission to reach Alpha Centauri after launch.

“But I think we have to do it as a civilization,” Loeb told Futurism. “We have to go in that direction and consider how to visit other stars, because currently all our eggs are in one basket here on Earth and we can’t ignore the risk from a catastrophe.”

Latest articles

Quebec under fire for failing to accommodate seniors unable to leave home for vaccinations

Twenty five years ago, Judith Cowling was told she had two years to live when she was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, a type...

Despite Its Pledges, Shell Funded Anti-Climate Lobbying Last Year

Royal Dutch Shell vowed last September to reach net-zero carbon pollution in its business by 2050. The goal was vague but notable, and...

Kaley Cuoco Opens Up About Finding Out Jim Parsons Was Leaving “Big Bang Theory”

"I knew that I was equal to them from day one," she said. "And that was never questioned in...

Having more friends may help female giraffes live longer

Grown-up giraffes just aren’t huggy, cuddling, demonstrative animals. So it took identity-recognition software grinding through five years of data to reveal that female...

Related articles

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here